A Uncomfortable REFLECTION

The human mind is able to create wonderful things.
Our enormous intellectual capacity allows us to conceive extraordinary ideas and concepts that are not able to find in nature around us and making us pure creators.
In fact, one of our intellectual creations of abstract character characterizes us and define us as a species.
And no, we're talking about art, or mathematics, nor religion, nor a sense of humor ...
We are talking about the hypocrisy.
Despite its obvious negative connotations, hypocrisy is a result of our superior intellect.

Hypocrisy has acquired such a level of refinement and development in humans and have so ingrained within us that has come to confuse our view of reality to the limit.
We have reached a level of existential hypocrisy and are faced with this level of confusion about the nature of our actions, we got to confuse the starkest and abject selfishness attitudes of love and respect that have nothing to do with the real nature of our actions .
One of the most egregious examples of this we see reflected in our relationship with animals.
This is a really hard issue to address as awake reactions and often visceral, fleeing any capacity for cold and rationale.
But if we have the courage to be honest with ourselves, we must accept that the relationship that our species has with the other animals on this planet is simply shameful.

And no, the passage of time has not improved the situation has worsened.
Despite what many people want to believe, today we have reached the highest levels of cruelty and meanness over other animals, because unlike other times or earlier civilizations, now our relationship with them is bathed in the most revolting hypocrisy.
Indeed, to reach the current state, we have laid hold centuries of another of our "best intellectual creations" arrogance.
Our arrogance as a species has led us to believe that other animals are incapable of feeling emotions, to think, to have personality, to develop cultural elements or communicate.
To reach such conclusions we have relied on the fact that we are unable to verify the existence of any of these features or elements in other animals, simply because we do not understand how they express themselves.
That allowed us to self convince the inferiority of other animals and thereby have refused any hint that resembles humans.
It was an act of arrogance concerned, which has allowed us to empty of content and thus have been able to conceptualize almost as if they were objects that can be manipulated at will, without having to face any guilt.
Thanks to the perfect symbiosis between arrogance and hypocrisy, we have allowed the freedom to turn animals into slaves to our service; tying them, lock them, cage them, mistreat or even today, killing mass murder applying industrial techniques.
And thanks to that wonderful intellectual instrument called hypocrisy, we managed to ease our consciences, because our actions we've applied the label "economic or nutritional need" and the lower and heinous cases, the label of "tradition and culture".

PARTY
When we speak of mistreatment disguised as "tradition and culture" animals, obviously the best example, emetic and disgusting example of this is the bullfights and similar festivals, where a set of degenerate gather to watch as a series people torturing an animal to death.
There is a show worldwide that is able to capture such a high level of villainy, human misery and cowardice, as offered us a bullfight.

Many contrary to this infamous show, people tend to focus their anger on the bullfighters or people jumping into the ring to face the animal.
But if we look coldly, and paradoxically, the bullfighter is perhaps the only one involved that deserves any respect.
Yes, it's true: his living torturing and killing animals such as wield the animalistic.
But let's face it: it does not remove him too much of a slaughterhouse employee, responsible for executing daily to thousands of pigs, chickens or cows defenseless, except that the "right-handed" risking their physical integrity with it.

Here, the true mean and depraved beings are the people who pay money to attend the show.
A set of cowards, gory and sadistic not have the courage to go down to the arena to face the bull to meet this "noble tradition that both claim to love".
If you really loved bullfighting and considered "a noble confrontation between man and animal" as qualifying them not be hidden behind high wooden barriers, nor sit in inaccessible stands several feet above the ring. They would be downstairs in direct contact with "the party" and the risk involved.

And is that even though they deny it, in the depths of their hearts, these vile and hypocritical beings harbor the intimate and shameful that the bull gores the matador and will tear the flesh desire, because deep down they envy for being able to kill the animal with his own hands.

Thus a bullfight in the background is simply a mirror in which viewers look: a mirror in which they see reflected his own sadism and his execrable cowardice.
And it matters little who attend this show are judges, players, agents and artists, even Picasso, Hemingway and Joaquín Sabina are called: they are a living representation of the lowest of the human species and its most blatant hypocrisy and lack of nobility .
It's something that costs to assimilate, but we must accept as one of the great "wonders of nature" is that someone can be a vicious, vile and cowardly completely miserable and still be a great artist.

The industrialized extermination

But beyond the case of bullfighting, which is a striking case, but it is still a residual, parochial and provincial representation of human indignity, what really characterizes today's world our cruelty and hypocrisy towards animals is our ability to apply industrial techniques of mass murder.
We are one of the few animals capable of creating large amounts of life for the sole purpose of being able to destroy it later and do it with a coldness and indifference that would call into question many of the assumptions moral and religious of the way we like about principles.

For us, chickens, pigs or cows have become mere delivery units proteins and are able to raise and hacinarlos for life without death camps only get to ask even the slightest doubt about our attitude or on the pain and suffering we cause.

Our capacity for abstraction, driven by our arrogance and our hypocrisy, allows us to erase from our minds the vision of animals individually, to become representations of the labels we apply to them ("pigs", "chicken", "calves" ), to become animated objects.
In doing so, we activate virtually the same mental mechanisms we use when we characterize an enemy, classified according to their uniform and label as "communist", "Jew", "black" or "French" in order to snatch any hint of individuality or humanity, erasing any possibility of empathy with him and to kill him freely in the name of ideals, a flag or country.
It is so sad and terrifying: in the back of our minds, just using the same logic to kill a chicken to kill an enemy, except that the animals are helpless and can apply on them our efficient extermination techniques Industrial.
And it matters little that regularly arise thousand and one scientific studies proving that all these animals harbor many more like us than initially thought.
(Click on the images to go to the articles)

Faced with the threat of a possible attack of conscience remove our beliefs and mental structures, quickly apply the mechanism "tagger" which allows us to classify animals into different categories so we can exterminate en masse to those who suit us, while we raise to the category of "best friends" who obey our best interests.

THE TRUTH ABOUT PETS
At this point of the article is likely that many readers are displayed agree with much of the above.
At the end of the day we played the "easy stuff": bullfighting, the industrialized extermination farms and slaughterhouses and this could have added the animal experiments, all controversial and debatable issues, but for which there is a argumentario Solid widely advocated by the "defenders of animal rights."

But there are other ramifications in this issue, which as mentioned above, can elicit visceral reactions, then strike a chord with our most detestable and rooted hypocrisy.
What if we address openly falsehood around the world of pets?
Begin to start some masks of hypocrisy.

It is outrageous to see how someone describes himself as "animal lover" just why have a dog or a cat at home.
A real "animal lover" would love all animals without distinction, not only to certain convertible domesticated species in pets.
She would worry not only about the welfare of their beloved puppy, but for all dogs, cats, rats, birds, mammals, reptiles and invertebrates of the animal kingdom, whatever they were, and were where they were.
A real "animal lover" could not be peacefully petting her kitty knowing that thousands of pigs, potentially more intelligent and loving your pussycat, traveling every second conveyor belts path of a cold and cruel death to end eventually filling your fridge or thousands of apes, many of which are equipped with more personality than some of your friends are tortured in the name of scientific progress in laboratories around the world.

So please, let's not be so damn hypocritical and not insult our intelligence and that of other qualifying us ourselves "animal lovers".
Most of us are not "animal lovers" because animals generally care about a horn; all that matters to us are our pets.

But let us go up the ladder more on the level of hypocrisy.
In today's society there is a growing number of people prefer before the pet animals to humans.
Networks websites are full of dog lovers in which these animals "real angels" and where are practically labeled "higher beings" us is qualified.
In some cases we seem to be the dawn of a new canine religion.
These people, often with an almost mystical expression on their faces, as if they see the Virgin, have no qualms in saying that "dogs are better than people."
And maybe they're right.

But there is also another option is that in many cases (not all, do not generalize), prefer dogs relate to people by sheer comfort and pure selfishness.
And is that people are complex, are difficult, contradictory, can cause pain with our decisions and attitudes and demand a level of commitment, intellectual effort and sacrifice will never require a dog.
So, perhaps behind this exacerbated love dogs, it really is comfort, fear, disability is hidden to feel empathy for others and a deep selfishness disguised love of animals with which these people find the perfect to escape all compromise with other human beings subterfuge.

Plain and simple, prefer the company of dogs, because they are easier to treat people: their responses are predictable and allow to place upon them love and good feelings, obtaining in exchange instant gratification as well as care for the animal.
They are "fast food" emotional; a quick and convenient way to get emotional nourishment without being forced to get into the kitchen of human relationships, where one is forced to prepare complicated recipes that can go wrong.
So also uproot this mask of hypocrisy.
We live in a society where people are caring for their dogs as if they were children or family members, but instead leave their parents in nursing homes, like chickens waiting "their turn".

PROPERTY ON ANIMALS
As mentioned in a previous article, in our mind we have created a fictitious concept that has led us to consider ourselves owners of everything in this planet.
We believe that the entire planet and everything that is home to our service.
And pets are a good example of this, although many people refuse to accept it.
Because in reality, the pets we have in our homes and that both simulated estimate, are nothing more than a product to us. A product of our property, as is a washing machine or slacks.
And like any good product to our service, must play a role that is useful to us.
And that function is to keep us company and offer free and easy dose of affection, without the shackles and complications involving human relationships.
This is how we stole the immensity of the sea goldfish and enclaustramos in small tanks with ridiculous decorations or we stole the vastness of the sky to the birds and locked in tiny cages in which we attended fascinated the beautiful spectacle of desperation .

Because for us are simple products. Products we buy in stores dedicated professional kidnapping.

And this has led us to live in crowded cities of prisoners.
Cats and sentenced to life imprisonment in small flats, entitled to a couple of day trips and some juicy whim benefit from feed ration ration and dogs.
And at the height of our selfishness and disgusting hypocrisy, the castrate with the excuse of "spare the suffering" involving sexual desire that can not see satisfied, when in fact we do to fulfill, as submissive slaves, their mission making us feel good, without having to suffer the inconvenience us their reproductive needs.
Hypocritically and ignoble we tell ourselves that it is "best for them" and we convince ourselves that we are the best thing that could happen to them these animals because we give them "lots of love" and a "good life".
It is certainly life we ​​all dream to have, right?
Life in a small jail, I think daily, castrated without the right to sex and programmed to love our jailers, who reward us with caresses and cuddle in our cell.
A dream come true ...
Much cynicism!
How much hypocrisy!

It is under pretexts like these, we educate our children by taking them to the zoo, that horrible prison full of prisoners around the world, clearly labeled and exposed to our apathetic enjoyment.
This is how we program our descendants, from tiny well, that tomorrow also be jailers and not come to consider the true meaning of his actions, scheduled to confuse his monstrous selfishness with a supposed "love of animals".
Enough of hypocrisy!
Let's face nature of our actions.
No subterfuge, no excuses.
Say things by their name, once and for all.
Let's say that animals are our property and are within our service.
Having different functions as any product we buy in a store.
Some are for our viewing enjoyment, others because it gives pleasure and caress other because they are rich when we eat.

And we care what they feel.

Say we have a dog because we need an animated object on which to place love and we provide free doses of affection without asking anything in return complicated.
Because they never tell us anything that offends us, or we berates our faults or defects.
Because we may be miserable, cowardly or some bastards, but he does not know and always gives us the reason.
Because thanks to its slavish obedience, we feel powerful and that allows us to hide our pathetic life of submission.

Say castrate him not to bother us and prevented their sexuality and their relationships because we are uncomfortable.
Let's say we auto programmed to love and mourn when suffering, but we will do whatever it takes to never be free and do not leave us alone.
Because above all, is OURS.

From our property.
As the car, the TV or slippers.
And let's say if we have a high regard for our car when he grows old, replace it with another.
And with the dog, do the same, because it has a role to play: serve.
This is reality.
And it has little to do with the alleged "love of animals".

What does it really mean to love animals?
Loving animals is to love what They are in Themselves and not the role for us.
Loving animals is to love their freedom. And That Means Knowing and accepting That Are Not Within our service.
They are not born to "lick the back" when we need it.
Who are not born for us to stroke His soft fur us When we want.
We accept That Should Live Their Lives As They and Where They Please please.
The birds fly free and cost us see Their plumage and We have to make do With Their listening to songs, hidden Among the branches.
They Know That goldfish swim Among the corals, DESPITE Not being reliable to see them.
Than are now available for our pets scamper woods or meadows and play freely, away from our eyes and our control.
That will cold, hungry and feel pain but May Also dispose of His lifetime As They choose.
And free will eat or be eaten, As it should be.
In short, we must accept That They are not our own.
Nor are the seas, and mountains.
As in reality it is nothing.
But if we are not reliable to withstand the true reality of nature in the end, if in the end we prefer to keep believing That animals are our property and are to our service, at Least Have the decency not to be so disgustingly hypocritical .. .
GAZZETTA THE APOCALYPSE

Via:Gazzetadelapocalipsis